Bitcoin vs. the Regulators: Now it’s a lot of posturing, but someday, somebody with a lot of Bitcoins is going to say “no.”

To paraphrase a famous quotation: “Every year, I get mad about the taxes I pay, until I realize that it is the admission ticket to the greatest show on earth: politics.”

Wherever you fall on the spectrum of regulation: always good, often good, neutral, often bad, or always bad, if you are interested in Bitcoin, you have a front seat to a really great show: the regulation of virtual currencies.

I attended a Miami Bitcoin meet-up last Tuesday, and there was a gentleman, friendly enough, though forceful, who would not let the issue go: “All of you who think that Bitcoin is free of government control are kidding yourselves. You are in for a very rude awakening.”

Yes, and…? I thought to myself.

For those of you who have been around long enough, you may remember the days when Bitcoiners would say, almost hopefully, that someday, maybe in the distant future – if Bitcoin were to become big enough – that it would get the attention of the government.

To be lectured about the inevitable involvement of the state was rather amusing, since it would have brought cheers just two years ago. “We’ve made it! Bitcoin is a success!”

And it is a success, by almost all measures. On Sunday a friend of mine overheard me talking Bitcoin with another friend: “Oh, didn’t that get shut down. Like, isn’t it over?” I said, “No, it’s up 1,000% since January.” She, being a well educated private equity professional, blinked a little bit quicker than normal.

So where are we today? FinCEN has progressively tightened their stance on the definition of “money transmitter,” now seemingly including anybody that deals in virtual currency in any capacity, and a California finance watch dog has shot a cannonball over the bow of the Bitcoin Foundation.

Unfortunately, this is having a truly negative effect on small businesses who are trying to grow the Bitcoin economy and play by the rules. Last week, I had my friend over, the CEO of, by all standards an upstanding and ambitious entrepreneur, who was agonizing over the question: “Am I a money transmitter?”

He’s not alone, but Bitcoin businesses are just proxies to the backbone of the Bitcoin movement: Bitcoin owners.

If the ambiguous regulatory rhetoric is to continue, then it will eventually progress past these establishments, and take aim at Bitcoin owners themselves. You, know, the individuals who own a string of numbers that can change numbers on a little piece of software that keeps track of some numbers.

Typically, it is incredibly difficult and expensive to defy the regulators. The established avenue is through public appeal and the court system. Regulators know this, and a tried and true tactic of snuffing out new enterprise that doesn’t jive with the established market players is to ensnare hopeful entrants in a quagmire of red tape. When it becomes too much to sustain, they just give up. They have to.

Looking forward, it seems reasonable to me that someday, maybe in the near future, that we will get to witness a regulatory demand upon an individual who owns a significant amount of Bitcoins – maybe 1,000, or 10,000, or 100,000.

When an individual puts his or her foot down and says, “no,” it’s usually in vain, since conventional assets can be frozen, garnished, or confiscated.

But let’s be clear – and the regulators should understand this, since it would be a great embarrassment to try – that if they push hard enough, somebody is going to say, “no.” They aren’t going to say, “NO, DAMMIT YOU CAN’T HAVE MY BITCOINS.” They are going to say, “no.”

And when they say, “no,” then the answer is, “no,” unless the state takes the confrontation to the next level. If somebody gives up their Bitcoins because they were beaten by a monkey wrench, then we will know that we’ve unequivocally entered a new era.

So sit back and enjoy the show. After all, you’re paying your taxes, right?


12 comments on “Bitcoin vs. the Regulators: Now it’s a lot of posturing, but someday, somebody with a lot of Bitcoins is going to say “no.”

  1. Boris says:

    A new era? Really? States have been beating people with proverbial monkey wrenches for centuries and they’ve never stopped. Get some perspective, buddy.

  2. b cecil says:

    The way the whole thing moves forward to open an exchange like mtgox but only gold and silver weights, not usd to be exchanged traded for btc. You need a small shop like a current cash shop or pawn broker that fronts all of the small trading for everyone, so you give them some gold or silver and they give you btc or you give them btc and they give you gold silver based on current exchange rates.. all 3 things cant be touched by megalomaniacs and are outside of “money regulation”

    this solves the problem of not much easy liquidity for easy transfer and payments actual with gold and silver now their value is transferable to btc, which is easily exchanged anywhere.

  3. /madb says:

    I think we might have been in the same meetup in MIA!

  4. Seph says:

    I’m not paying my taxes…

  5. Menachem Began says:

    The government agents will seize his device, use a device OS backdoor to unlock his wallet, and then calmly transfer the coins to a government account.

    My device is unlocked. They just need the device. Period.

  6. Prof. Evans says:

    Meanwhile, Chinese Central TV has allowed a largely positive Bitcoin documentary to air, the Canadian financial regulators have promised to regulate with a light hand, and the German tax authorities have announced that Germany’s 0% long-term capital gains rate applies to Bitcoin held for more than one year.

    US regulators might continue to play the American Exceptionalism game, or they might just huff and puff a bit and then get distracted by some other sparkly bauble.

    For my part, I’m keeping my eye on, which brings Bitcoin to the feature phones (i.e., web-enabled pre-smartphones) in the Developing World, where using telephones to make purchases is already normal, but making transactions cross borders is exceptionally difficult.

  7. Having various eggs in rosland capital various baskets could be a good choice because they are greatly needed.

    Also, a stronger RMB will raise Chinese import demand, indirectly affecting the demand for the commodity from the people who
    see it as an investment. Gold diversifies your portfolio as well as an apparent protection
    danger, even though it does not degrade kept in
    storage – have a look at the four sources of demand growth.

  8. SleepyBison says:

    Well, I wouldn’t worry about the value of bitcoin just yet. Sir Richard Branson of Virgin Galactic just announced that one can pay for space travel on a VG ship with BTC (, so with billionaire space-knights backing it up, it can’t go wrong… right?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s